When scientists go to court (Allgemein)

Alexander Lerchl , Dienstag, 07.11.2023, 13:56 (vor 407 Tagen) @ Dariusz Leszczynski

That is your opinion... and there was a reason why A.L. was rejected from participation in IARC 2011. He had expertise but he was informed that his attitudes toward scientists with different opinions were... as they were, unsuitable for civilized debate. So, in general, scientists do not go to courts of law... but A.L. it is a different story... And that is my opinion.

But, let's get back to science...

Either you don't know the letter from IARC from 2010 or you do know it and hide the truth. I was rejected because I had published too many critical comments on published studies. In my opinion, Baan was annoyed that he had to publish a "Letter of Concern" in 2009 because of my observations that the data from Vienna could not be correct in my opinion. Interestingly, the full text of the Letter of Concern is - once again - not freely accessible. Unbelievable.

--
"Ein Esoteriker kann in fünf Minuten mehr Unsinn behaupten, als ein Wissenschaftler in seinem ganzen Leben widerlegen kann." Vince Ebert