5G & Corona: Telegram füttert Gigaherz-Forum kalorienarm (Allgemein)

Gustav, Donnerstag, 09.12.2021, 18:18 (vor 420 Tagen) @ H. Lamarr

Aufschlussreich ist auch der Review process, dort findet man selektiv ausgesuchte Aussagen wie diese:

However, this consideration has some limitations, which make the conclusions of the author rather immature.

The author referred to the ICNIRP 2009 guidelines, which are outdated as far as ICNIRP has recently updated them.

However, the authors need to sharpen their language to clarify what has been demonstrated, and have the conclusions be fully reflective of what the data have shown.

Ab besten gefällt mir Reviewer #4:

This manuscript is totally lacking in scientific value.

Although the ideas put forward by the authors are not negligible, they are open issues to criticism. Because there is no scientific study that clearly reveals the relationship between RFRs, especially 5G and SARS-CoV-2.

Please cite evidence (referenced studies) supporting this hypothesis by specific models and/or real-time measurements.

Unpublished/not available data should not be considered as citation.

Your paper is hypothetical, so please remain in this hypothetical framework throughout the manuscript. Phrases such as "This is the first scientific paper documenting a link between RFR emitted by wireless communication devices and COVID-19" are unwarranted.


gesamter Thread:

 RSS-Feed dieser Diskussion

powered by my little forum