Sendemasten doch in 2B-Wertung der IARC enthalten? (Allgemein)

Alexander Lerchl @, Donnerstag, 23.02.2012, 12:17 (vor 3369 Tagen) @ Doris

@ Doris: Haben Sie für das Zitat von Leszczynski eine Quelle / einen Link?

Danke,

Alexander Lerchl

Leszczynski, der dabei war, schreibt:

JUST TO BE CLEAR:

"SMART METERS" WERE NOT DISCUSSED IN 2011 AT THE IARC MEETING THAT CLASSIFIED CELL PHONE RADIATION AS A POSSIBLE CARCINOGEN.

IN FACT THE CELL TOWER RADIATION, WLAN AND WI-FI WERE NOT DEBATED TOO.

THERE WAS ENOUGH CONTROVERSY WITH THE DEBATE AROUND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT CELL PHONE RADIATION MIGHT CAUSE CANCER.

und weiter...

No I am not wrong. The debate in Lyon was about cell phones because only such scientific evidence was available. There are no studies on "smart meters".

However, because the radiation emitted by cell phones and some "smart meters" is "microwaves", the generalization has been made by Robert.

Remember, that the problem is not only of quality of radiation but also of quantity. "Smart meters" emit much less radiation than cell phone next to your head.

My statement is correct. "Smart meters" as such were not debated in Lyon.

--
"Ein Esoteriker kann in fünf Minuten mehr Unsinn behaupten, als ein Wissenschaftler in seinem ganzen Leben widerlegen kann." Vince Ebert

Tags:
Leszczynski


gesamter Thread:

 RSS-Feed dieser Diskussion

powered by my little forum